USPTO serial 75143727
SMARTCOMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMARTCOMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrea Van Kampen
ANDREA VAN KAMPEN ZIFF-DAVIS PUBLISHING COMPANYONE PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic publications recorded on CD-ROMs and disks, namely, magazines and sections and columns thereof, and supplements thereto, and newsletters and brochures, featuring news and information in the fields of computer, computing, communications, information and high technology and business, technology and information management | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | printed publications, namely, magazines and sections and columns thereof, and supplements thereto, and newsletters and brochures, featuring news and information in the fields of computer, computing, communications, information and high technology and business, technology and information management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ziff-Davis Publishing Company
- Other trademarks owned by Ziff-Davis Publishing Company
- Other trademarks owned by ZIFF-DAVIS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ZD
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named SMARTCOMPANY
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 20, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 17, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 16, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 15, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |