USPTO serial 75143934
UNITED STATES ELECTRONIC MAIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, JEFFERY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNITED STATES ELECTRONIC MAIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R CLIFFORD POTTER
R CLIFFORD POTTER FREEBORN & PETERS311 S WACKER DR STE 3000CHICAGO, IL 60606-6677UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | applying electronic date and time stamp and digital signature to electronic documents and transactions to verify time and date received and that documents and transactions have not been altrered after application of digital signature | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 26, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 25, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 25, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 25, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 1998 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |