Drawing for PLUG AND PUMP

USPTO serial 75144117

PLUG AND PUMP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLUG AND PUMP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK B. ANGRES

MARK B ANGRES DAVIDSON BERQUIST JACKSON & GOWDEY LLP4300 WILSON BLVD 7TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal valve connectors for use in connecting a pressure source to valves of sports equipment and to valves of tires for mobile machineryACTIVE
007Valve connectors for use as components of pumps and other pressure sources for inflating tires of mobile machinery, namely valve connectors for use in connecting the pressure source to the tire valvesACTIVE
020Plastic valve connectors for use in connecting a pressure source to valves of sports equipment and to valves of tires for mobile machineryACTIVE
028Valve connectors for use as components of pumps and other pressure sources for inflating sports equipment, namely, valve connectors for use in connecting the pressure source to the sports equipmentACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jun 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 13, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Apr 13, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Apr 13, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 28, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Feb 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 26, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Oct 12, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Oct 12, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 3, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Apr 27, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 15, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Apr 15, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 9, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 5, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 7, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 27, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 9, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 15, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 23, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 3, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 3, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 28, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Feb 25, 200244EDSEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED
Sep 29, 2001DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jul 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 5, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Oct 16, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 11, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 22, 1999DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
May 20, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 25, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 29, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 4, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 27, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 18, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 18, 19971.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED
Jan 29, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance