USPTO serial 75144168
AROMASPA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUTHEY, LYNN A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AROMASPA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard Foote
HERBERT C ROSS OPPENHEIMER, WOLFF & DONNELLY LLPONE CITICORP CTR153 E 53RD STNEW YORK, NY 10022Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cologne, body lotion, body powder, body talcum powder, body soap, body cleansing preparation, shower gel, bath beads, bath oil, massage oil and scented ceramic stones | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 10, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 29, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |