USPTO serial 75144183
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
St. Paul, MN
ST. PAUL, MN
St. Paul, MN
St. Paul, MN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Pape
MICHAEL J PAPE KINNEY & LANGE PATHE KINNEY & LANGE BLDG 312 S THMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415-1002UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | labeling information system comprised of adhesive backed multi-page booklets with releasable adhesive closure on the top page | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 31, 1996 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CNSR | ALLOWED SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 2, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 9, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |