USPTO serial 75144279
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Markham, Ontario, CA
Markham, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Hale
JOHN S HALE GIPPLE & HALE667-B OLD DOMINION DRMCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | vegetable gum based snack foods flavored with fruit juices | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 1998 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 9, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 1998 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 12, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 22, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |