Drawing for AMINO ACID EXTRACTION PROCESS

USPTO serial 75145534

AMINO ACID EXTRACTION PROCESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEVINE, HOWARD B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMINO ACID EXTRACTION PROCESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDMUND J. SEASE

EDMUND J SEASE ZARLEY, MCKEE, THOMTE, VOORHEES & SEASE801 GRAND AVE STE 3200DES MOINES, IA 50309UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005animal nutritional feed supplementsABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 29, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 2, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 2, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 29, 1999EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Aug 31, 1998CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Jun 30, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 8, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Sep 3, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 6, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance