USPTO serial 75150574
WORKING CLASS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2582481Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 18, 2002
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WORKING CLASS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Lerner
Mark Lerner SATTERLEE STEPHENS BURKE & BURKE LLP230 Park AvenueSuite 1130NEW YORK, NY 10169-0079Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | fragrances, namely, perfume, cologne, scented body sprays, toilet water and scented essential oils; hair care products, namely, shampoo, conditioner, hair gel, hair mousse, hair spray; bath products, namely bath and shower gel, bubble bath, non-medicated bath salts; soap and cleanser for face and body; deodorant; and moisturizing creams and lotions all for personal use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 18, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 12, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 12, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 31, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 13, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 12, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |