USPTO serial 75157356
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JUDSON D. CARY
JUDSON D CARYP O BOX 4958ENGLEWOOD, CO 80155-4958UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment in the nature of video programs on a wide range of topics associated with cities, states and other geographical areas emanating from a web site on a global computer network | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | information services, namely, providing information on a wide variety of topics associated with cities, states and other geographical areas, by means of a global computer network and via a cable television network; computer services, namely, providing a computer data base and a web site featuring information on a wide range of topics associated with cities, states and other geographical areas; computer services, namely, providing multiple user access to a global computer information network for the transfer and dissemination of information on a wide range of information | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 17, 1999 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 16, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 29, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 7, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |