USPTO serial 75157948
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
NETWORKS ASSOCIATES TECHNOLOGY, INC.
SANTA CLARA, CA
Other trademarks owned by NETWORKS ASSOCIATES TECHNOLOGY, INC.
GRAND CAYMAN, KY
Menlo Park, CA
NETWORKS ASSOCIATES TECHNOLOGY, INC.
SANTA CLARA, CA
Other trademarks owned by NETWORKS ASSOCIATES TECHNOLOGY, INC.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW P BRIDGES
ANDREW P BRIDGES WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI PC650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational testing service in the field of computer networks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 2, 1993 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 3, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |