Drawing for VIRTUAL RETINAL DISPLAY

USPTO serial 75162011

VIRTUAL RETINAL DISPLAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIRTUAL RETINAL DISPLAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KENT A FISCHMANN

KENT A FISCHMANN HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP1700 LINCOLN STE 4100DENVER, CO 80203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electro-optic image projection devices, namely, devices for projecting an image directly onto the eyeACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 5, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 26, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Dec 13, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Dec 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 12, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 21, 1999NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED
Mar 1, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 1, 1999PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Nov 10, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 17, 1998PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Feb 24, 1998ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 28, 1997UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Jul 21, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 14, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance