USPTO serial 75163778
B BAUER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with B BAUER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BEAVERTON, OR
ST-JEROME, QUEBEC, CA
ST-JEROME, QUEBEC, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK SOMMERS
CHRISTIE BATY HEINZE FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, ET AL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | hockey helmets; in-line skating helmets; and face guards, visors, cages, and masks for such helmets | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | all-purpose sports bags, fanny packs, and duffel bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing for use in playing hockey and for in-line skating, namely, pants, jerseys, socks, stockings, underwear, caps, hats, T-shirts, rink suits, gym suits, jogging suits, sport shorts, compression shorts, tights, racing shirts, warm-up jackets, shower sandals, insoles, liners for ice skates, roller skates, in-line roller skates, and sport shoes | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | sports articles and replacement parts therefor, namely, ice skates, hockey skates, roller skates, in-line roller skates, ice skate blades, in-line skate chassis, wheels, and brakes; hockey sticks, hockey stick shafts, hockey goaltender sticks, hockey stick replacement blades, hockey pucks, and hockey balls; hockey goal nets; sports bags specifically designed to carry hockey equipment; skate blade guards, and skate blade protective jackets; jerseys, socks, and stockings specifically designed for the practice of hockey; body protective articles and equipment specifically designed for the practice of ice hockey, roller hockey, street hockey, ringette, field hockey, dek hockey, and ball hockey, namely, throat protectors, body pads, shoulder pads, elbow pads, gloves, pants comprising body protective padding and guards, girdles comprising body protective padding, suspenders specifically designed for use with hockey pants, shin guards, shin pads, wrist slash guards, chest protectors, arm pads, hip pads, leg guards, knee pads, ankle pads, ankle guards, chin protectors, neck guards, teeth guards, goal pads, trapper gloves, blockers, garter belts for hockey stockings, athletic supporters and cups, jockstraps, and pelvic protectors; body protective articles for in-line skating, namely, knee and elbow pads, wrist guards, and guard gloves and friction tape | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NIKE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BAUER NIKE HOCKEY INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BAUER NIKE HOCKEY INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BAUER INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named B BAUER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2005 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |