USPTO serial 75163780
B BAUER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with B BAUER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BEAVERTON, OR
Montreal, Quebec, CA
ST-JEROME, QUEBEC, CA
ST-JEROME, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK SOMMERS
CHRISTIE BATY HEINZE FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, ET AL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Hockey helmets; in-line skating helmets; and face guards, visors, cages, and masks for such helmets | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | All-purpose sports bags, fanny packs, and duffel bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing for use in playing hockey and for in-line skating, namely, pants, jerseys, socks, stockings, underwear, caps, hats, T-shirts, rink suits, gym suits, jogging suits, sport shorts, compression shorts, tights, racing shirts, warm-up jackets, shower sandals, insoles, liners for ice skates, roller skates, in-line roller skates, and sport shoes, jerseys, socks and stockings specifically designed and constructed for the practice of hockey, suspenders specifically designed for use with hockey pants, garter belts for hockey stockings | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Sports articles and replacement parts therefor, namely, ice skates, hockey skates, roller skates, in-line roller skates, ice skate blades, in-line skate chassis, wheels, and brakes; hockey sticks, hockey stick shafts, hockey goaltender sticks, hockey stick replacement blades, hockey pucks, and hockey balls; hockey goal nets; sports bags specifically designed to carry hockey equipment; skate blade guards, and skate blade protective jackets; body protective articles and equipment specifically designed for the practice of ice hockey, roller hockey, street hockey, ringette, field hockey, dek hockey, and ball hockey, namely, throat protectors, body pads, shoulder pads, elbow pads, gloves, pants comprising body protective padding and guards, girdles comprising body protective padding shin guards, wrist slash guards, chest protectors, arm pads, hip pads, leg guards, knee pads, ankle pads, ankle guards, chin protectors, neck guards, teeth guards, goal pads, trapper gloves, blockers, athletic supporters and cups, jockstraps, and pelvic protectors; body protective articles for in-line skating, namely, knee and elbow pads, wrist guards, and guard gloves | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NIKE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BAUER INC
- Other trademarks owned by BAUER NIKE HOCKEY INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BAUER NIKE HOCKEY INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named B BAUER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 22, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2006 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 31, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | 44ED | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | 44ED | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2001 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 26, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |