USPTO serial 75171010
CONNOLLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BALDWIN, SCOTT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONNOLLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London SW19 1DW, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL D FISHMAN
MICHAEL D FISHMAN RADER FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC1533 N WOODWARD AVE STE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | leather and imitations of leather sold in bulk, animal skins and hides, namely, raw hides, raw leather, tanned skin and sponge leather; imitation leather sheets; articles made of leather and imitations of leather, namely, whips, harnesses, saddlery, seats for horses and carriages, trunks, leather toolkit covers, umbrella handles, briefcases, leather straps for luggage, purses, coin purses; handbags, wallets, name card cases, credit card cases, passport covers, luggage, namely, trunks and traveling bags, suitcases, satchels, carry-on bags, all-purpose athletic bags, backpacks, and rucksacks | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | expensive clothing and footwear, namely, driving sweaters, sweaters, shirts, skirts, mock turtle neck shirts, turtle neck shirts, ties, stoles, belts, leather belts and socks; mechanic's overalls; footwear, namely, boots, shoes, sandals and slippers; headgear, namely, hats, caps, visors, and scarves | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 28, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 10, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |