USPTO serial 75173696
APTEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with APTEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANNE H PECK
ANNE H PECK COOLEY GODWARD LLP5 PALO ALTO SQ3000 EL CAMINO REALPALO ALTO, CA 94306-2155Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | dissemination of advertising for others over global and local computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | electronic transmission of data and multimedia information over global and local computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | consulting services, namely, providing analysis, modeling and projections regarding the information and product needs of global and local computer network users and the content of network sites | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by APTEX SOFTWARE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Aptex Software Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by APTEX SOFTWARE INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named APTEX
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 28, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 2, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 30, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |