USPTO serial 75180692
INTEGRISOFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 2, 2000
- Examiner
- BECK, LORETTA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTEGRISOFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICK J O'BRIEN
MICHAEL J DALTON DONAHUE GALLAGHER WOODS & WOOD, LLP300 LAKESIDE DRSTE 1900OAKLAND, CA 94612-3570Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software designed for software development and testing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 31, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 2, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 13, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 22, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 1998 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 1998 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |