USPTO serial 75184053
KIZMIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 11, 2000
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KIZMIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
STYLING TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
PHOENIZ, AZ
STYLING TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
PHOENIZ, AZ
Scottsdale, AZ
STYLING TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
PHOENIZ, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN STONE ROSENFIELD
SUSAN STONE ROSENFIELD O'CONNOR CAVANAGH ANDERSON ET ALONE E CAMELBACK RD STE 1100PHOENIX, AZ 85012-1656UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Nail care preparations directed to the professional salon industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STYLING TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by STYLING TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Pro Finish U.S.A., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by STYLING TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named KIZMIT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 14, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 24, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 1998 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 1998 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |