USPTO serial 75187087
NETADVANTAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2598183Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 23, 2002
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NETADVANTAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Fishman
MICHAEL D FISHMAN RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC39533 WOODWARD AVE STE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business supervision and management of telecommunication network installations and activation in the field of hybrid optical fiber and coaxial cable television systems, namely, selection, hiring and management of installation contractors, scheduling of system builds, ordering and management of materials used to build systems, and documenting work performed by installation contractors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Cable and fiber splicing installation services for others in the field of hybrid optical fiber and coaxial cable television systems, namely, on-site cable/fiber splicing, in-field fusion and mechanical splicing during the installation of optical links | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | design, and mapping and documentation, namely, layout, drafting and blueprinting of hybrid optical fiber and coaxial cable television networks for others; integration of telecommunications networks for hybrid optical fiber and coaxial cable television systems, namely, integration of third party content, implementation of emergency alert systems, integration of advertisement insertion systems and network management systems, integration of design and testing systems, integration of fiber hubs and wiring centers; telecommunication network testing and certification services for others in the field of hybrid optical fiber and coaxial television systems, namely, network certification of two-way broadband testing, equipment bench testing, sweep and balance certification, system acceptance testing and proof of performance certification | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION OF DELAWARE
- Other trademarks owned by GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NETADVANTAGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 28, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 22, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 14, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 5, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 13, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |