Drawing for KOKUYO

USPTO serial 75188969

KOKUYO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KOKUYO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID EHRLICH

DAVID EHRLICH FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cleaners for use on computer keyboards and office equipmentACTIVE—
006prefabricated metal telephone booths; metal unit partition panels, metal partition walls and flexible walls; safes made of metal; metal flooring, namley, flexible flooring for attachment to office equipment; semi-automatic doors made of metal; metal pallets, metal step ladders, metal curtain rings, metal card rings and metal hooksACTIVE—
007book binding machinesACTIVE—
009electronic safes; electric magnetic-wave shield aprons for computer operatorsACTIVE—
016paper hole punchesACTIVE—
019non-metal prefabricated telephone booths; non-metal door panels, non-metal roofing panels, non-metal wall panels, flooring underlayments and non-metal curtain walls; non-metal flooringACTIVE—
020free standing office partitions and moveable office partitions; partitions for furniture; modular seating units for use in theatersACTIVE—
021cleaning equipment, namely, brooms, mops and dust pans; trash cans; clothes hangersACTIVE—
024table mats (not of paper)ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2001EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 11, 2001EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 13, 2000EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2000EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 9, 2000EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 6, 2000EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 10, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 7, 1999EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 19, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 29, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 14, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 21, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 30, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance