USPTO serial 75191329
COVEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUHLKE, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COVEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
28770-COLMENAR VIEJO, Madrid, ES
28770-COLMENAR VIEJO, Madrid, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES B RODMAN
CHARLES B RODMAN RODMAN & RODMAN7-11 S BROADWAYWHITE PLAINS, NY 10601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceutical preparations, namely, for brain disorders, food for medically restricted diets, baby food | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | non-alcoholic coffee, tea and cocoa based beverages, cookies and low calorie cookies not for medical use | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | non-alcoholic drinks, namely, fruit drinks, fruit juices, carbonated fruit drinks, carbonated soft drinks, soft drinks made with coffee, tea and cocoa | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 22, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 15, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |