Drawing for LIFELINK

USPTO serial 75191951

LIFELINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
THOMPSON, LAVERNE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIFELINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PAUL J REILLY

PAUL J REILLY BAKER BOTTS LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for the storage and retrieval of longitudinal patient-level informationACTIVE
042providing longitudinal patient-level information based on patients's medical histories to pharmaceutical manufacturers, medical care providers, and health coverage payorsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 8, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 8, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
May 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
May 14, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
May 14, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 14, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Nov 14, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jun 6, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 14, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Mar 7, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 29, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 14, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 14, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 9, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 30, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 6, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 7, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 17, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 10, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 2, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance