USPTO serial 75193428
FLYING HORSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLYING HORSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
91757 Treuchtlingen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KLAUS P STOFFEL
KLAUS P STOFFEL COHEN PONTANI LIEBERMAN & PAVANE551 FIFTH AVE STE 1210NEW YORK, NY 10176UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, coffee substitutes; flours and cereal preparations; bread, fine baked goods and confectionery goods, ice cream; honey, molasses syrup; yeast, baking powder; salt; table salt; mustard; vinegar, sauces (condiments); spices; cooling ice; coffee, tea, cocoa or chocolate drinks; coffee or cocoa preparations for making non-alcoholic drinks; cereals prepared for human consumption, particularly oat flakes and other cereal flakes; flavorings for foodstuffs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |