USPTO serial 75193875
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
8166 NIEDERWENINGEN, CH
Irvine, CA
SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND INTERNATIONAL SAGL
LUGANO, CH
Other trademarks owned by SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND INTERNATIONAL SAGL
Irvine, CA
Santa Monica, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING FOR [ MEN, ] WOMEN, [ AND CHILDREN, ] NAMELY, LOUNGE WEAR, PAJAMAS; SPORTSWEAR AND PLAYWEAR, NAMELY, SHORTS, T-SHIRTS, SWEATS | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Aug 12, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2022 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2022 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 23, 2021 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 24, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 24, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 2, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 25, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 4, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |