USPTO serial 75195186
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Road Town, Tortola, VG
Road Town, Tortola, VG
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KAREN N IKEDA
KAREN N IKEDA BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP2 EMBARCADERO PL2200 GENG RDPALO ALTO, CA 94303| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | frozen shrimp in all forms, namely, frozen green headless shrimp and frozen value added shrimp, namely, peeled and deveined shrimp, peeled un-deveined shrimp and breaded shrimp; and fresh shrimp in all forms, namely, fresh shrimp with the shell and fresh peeled shrimp; all of the foregoing to be used for food purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2005 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 1998 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 30, 1998 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 10, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |