USPTO serial 75196579
FREQUENCY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BECK, LORETTA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FREQUENCY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHELLE BROWNLEE
MICHELLE BROWNLEE COOLEY GODWARD LLPONE MARITIME PLZ20TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3580Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in analyzing the performance of semiconductor designs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 8, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 25, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 12, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |