USPTO serial 75196862
CEMTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2518911Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 18, 2001
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CEMTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Col. Centro, 64000 Monterrey, N.L., MX
Col. Centro, 64000 Monterrey, N.L., MX
Col. Centro, 64000 Monterrey, N.L., MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A THOMAS S SAFFORD
A THOMAS S SAFFORD FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer consultation services in the field of development implementation, use, analysis, installation, and support of computer-based systems used in commercial and industrial and business management consultation, planning, coordination, and assistance, and related computer applications for information transmission technology, automation of production processes and data transfers, purchasing, finance, human resources, equipment maintenance, retailing, payroll systems, global computer information networks, groupware, networking, network and systems management, telecommunications, telephone communications, logistical support tools, multimedia, education support, office applications, and executive information systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 2, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 23, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |