USPTO serial 75197769
PLYBOO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLYBOO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK M NEWMAN
MARK M NEWMAN BARNES & THORNBURG1401 EYE ST NW STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | full range of furniture and furniture accessories, namely, beds, couches, chairs, tables, display stands, seats, desks, lounges, shelves, lamps, lanterns, cupboards, chests, dressers, wardrobes, closets, mirrors, picture frames, mats, dishes, trays and racks made from bamboo, cane, rattan and wood as well as mats, carpets, wall hangings, blankets and material for covering furniture | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | carpets, rugs, mats for covering flooring and non-textile wall hangings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |