USPTO serial 75200397
DETROIT GEARLESS LOCKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 10, 1999
- Examiner
- SMITH, CHAD
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DETROIT GEARLESS LOCKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E LAUBSCHER SR
LAWRENCE E LAUBSCHER SR LAUBSCHER & LAUBSCHER745 S 23RD ST STE 300ARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | differentials for motor vehicles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 13, 2006 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 1, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 11, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |