USPTO serial 75201725
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D PETER HARVEY
D PETER HARVEY CARR MUSSMAN & HARVEY LLPTHREE EMBARCADERO CTR STE 1060SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for global computer networks, namely, software development environments, middleware, browsers, realtime operating systems and client/server software | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | business consultation services related to the development and marketing of computer software and hardware and computer services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | arranging and conducting educational conferences; computer education training services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | technical consultation services related to the development of computer software, computer programming services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |