USPTO serial 75206677
CONTROLNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONTROLNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN J HORN
JOHN J HORN ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY INCSR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COUNSEL1201 S 2ND ST DEPT 704PMILWAUKEE, WI 53204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and software factory automation communication network at control level | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 17, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 4, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 7, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |