Drawing for DISCUS DENTAL

USPTO serial 75209345

DISCUS DENTAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HORRALL, PATRICIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DISCUS DENTAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LEONARD J LEV

LEONARD J LEV SWEENEY LEV & BLINKOFF708 3RD AVE 14TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005dental abrasives, dental adhesives, dental amalgams, dental bonding agents, dental cements and adhesive liners, dental luting agents, dental polish, dental resins, dental rinse, anesthetic for dental purposes, fluoride dental treatment preparation, gargles and pharmaceutical preparations for use in the treatment of periodontal disease, halitosis, tooth decay, gingivitis, tooth decoloration, oral cancer detection and oral rehabilitationACTIVE
010X-ray photographs for medical purposes; dental examination equipment, namely, chairs and lamps; dental instruments, namely, burrs, picks, mirrors, tongue scrapers; dental articulators, dental drill discs, burrs and wheels, dental handpieces, dental implants, dental impression trays, dental sponges, bite registration paper, endodontic pins, posts and core material, occluders, anesthetic delivery apparatus, anesthetic masks, surgical masks, surgical gloves, gingival retraction cordsACTIVE
021manual toothbrushes and electric toothbrushes, dental flossACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2000DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jun 24, 2000EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Apr 6, 2000DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Apr 6, 2000EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Oct 27, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Sep 30, 1999EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 31, 1999DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jul 30, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 5, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 5, 1999DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Oct 6, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 14, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 6, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 13, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 15, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 18, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance