USPTO serial 75209345
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEONARD J LEV
LEONARD J LEV SWEENEY LEV & BLINKOFF708 3RD AVE 14TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | dental abrasives, dental adhesives, dental amalgams, dental bonding agents, dental cements and adhesive liners, dental luting agents, dental polish, dental resins, dental rinse, anesthetic for dental purposes, fluoride dental treatment preparation, gargles and pharmaceutical preparations for use in the treatment of periodontal disease, halitosis, tooth decay, gingivitis, tooth decoloration, oral cancer detection and oral rehabilitation | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | X-ray photographs for medical purposes; dental examination equipment, namely, chairs and lamps; dental instruments, namely, burrs, picks, mirrors, tongue scrapers; dental articulators, dental drill discs, burrs and wheels, dental handpieces, dental implants, dental impression trays, dental sponges, bite registration paper, endodontic pins, posts and core material, occluders, anesthetic delivery apparatus, anesthetic masks, surgical masks, surgical gloves, gingival retraction cords | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | manual toothbrushes and electric toothbrushes, dental floss | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 19, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 24, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 14, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |