USPTO serial 75216638
INTEGRITY ONLINE A CLEANER INTERNET SERVICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTEGRITY ONLINE A CLEANER INTERNET SERVICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
INTEGRITY ONLINE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, LLC
ALOHA, OR
Other trademarks owned by INTEGRITY ONLINE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, LLC
INTEGRITY ONLINE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, LLC
ALOHA, OR
Other trademarks owned by INTEGRITY ONLINE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, LLC
INTEGRITY ONLINE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, LLC
ALOHA, OR
Other trademarks owned by INTEGRITY ONLINE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Aloha, OR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTIN S. GOLDBERG
MARTIN S GOLDBERG PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | PROVIDING FILTERED ACCESS TO THE INTERNET INCLUDING EMAIL SERVICE, NAMELY, AN INTERNET ACCESS SERVICE WHICH FILTERS OUT OBJECTIONABLE WORDS AND IMAGES, PORNOGRAPHY AND OTHER OFFENSIVE MATERIALS, PRIMARILY TARGETED TO EDUCATORS, PARENTS, LIBRARIANS AND OTHER FAMILY-ORIENTED ORGANIZATIONS | ABANDONED | Nov 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRITY ONLINE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRITY ONLINE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRITY ONLINE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Jones, Richard V.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named INTEGRITY ONLINE A CLEANER INTERNET SERVICE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 18, 2001 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |