Drawing for SAINT-TROPEZ

USPTO serial 75216946

SAINT-TROPEZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAINT-TROPEZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM C FUESS

10951 SORRENTO VALLEY RD STE II-GSAN DIEGO, CA 92121-1613UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042computer services, namely, providing access time to an online data base in the field of geographic-specific location and destination information concerning attractions, businesses and events for tourists, travelers and residentsACTIVEAug 29, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 15, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jan 28, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 28, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Jun 11, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Apr 15, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 10, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 14, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
May 18, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 14, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 28, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance