USPTO serial 75216969
STRONG WOMEN STAY YOUNG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERK, STEVEN R
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STRONG WOMEN STAY YOUNG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JULIA B SHER
JULIA B SHER STRONG AND YOUNG LLC125 COLLIDGE STBROOKLINE, MA 02146UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | educational audiotapes and videotapes on the subjects of exercise, fitness and health; computer software featuring publications on the subjects of exercise, fitness, and health that may be downloaded from a global computer network | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 3, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 3, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 3, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 30, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |