USPTO serial 75217815
CV TRANSLIFTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CV TRANSLIFTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
South El Monte, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS A RUNK
THOMAS A RUNK FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT LLPCTR W10877 WILSHIRE BLVD TENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90024Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | overhead crane systems, namely, supporting frames; runway beams; overhead cranes; end trucks; bridge girders; drive motors; reducer wheels; hoists; electrical conductors; electrical controls including cabinest; pendant stations or remote control operators; and air supply systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 31, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 5, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |