USPTO serial 75217947
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Saint-Laurent, Quebec H4N 2G5, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | video conferencing terminals used to establish visual, audio and data links between parties at different locations through the use of digital video compression and digital telephone lines; video monitors; video cameras; slide converters; white boards; speakers; microphones; personal computer based compression/decompression devices (codec) and hardware based compression/decompression devices (codec); video conferencing cabinets; computer operating programs; infrared keypads; graphics tablets; infrared pens with tablets; pointing devices, namely, pens with tablets and personal computer mice; video recorders and players; video document cameras; and document cameras | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | maintenance and repair of video conferencing equipment | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | system analysis and computer programming services for others in the field of video conferencing, rental of video conferencing equipment and general consulting services in the field of video conferencing and networking | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |