USPTO serial 75218404
SR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Astringents for health purposes; food supplements; nutritional supplements, namely, health bars; herbal powders; vitamins, herbal supplements and mineral supplements in all forms including tablets, capsules, liquids and powder; dietary food supplements; dietary supplements; fiber supplements; nutritional powder; teas for health purposes; nutritional supplements, namely, acidophilus; herb food concentrates for health purposes; mouth drop supplements for health purposes; nutritional fiber bars for health purposes; chlorophyll electrolyte drinks; bee pollen for nutritional uses; and alfalfa for nutritional uses; all for health purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 24, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 24, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |