USPTO serial 75218512
MALLORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MALLORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Itapevi/SP, BR
Itapevi/SP, BR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | dishwashers, electric food blenders, electric juicers, electric garbage disposal units and vacuum cleaners all for domestic usage | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | electric household fans, ceiling fans, electric coffee brewers, electric hot plates, electric toasters, kitchen ventilators for use with kitchen stoves and water purifying filters all for domestic usage | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 29, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 29, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 18, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |