USPTO serial 75220493
THE JESUS DOLL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE JESUS DOLL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN P MURTAUGH
JOHN P MURTAUGH PEARNE & GORDON LLP1801 E 9TH ST STE 1200CLEVELAND, OH 44114-3108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | dolls | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 1, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 1, 1997 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |