USPTO serial 75220512
ARCAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 24, 2002
- Examiner
- LE, MARGARET
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 704 applies to Madrid Protocol extensions of protection in the U.S. Section 71 (similar to Section 8) showing continued use was accepted. The U.S. extension remains active. Follow Madrid and USPTO deadlines for the next renewal cycle.
Need help with ARCAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London SE22 9PQ, GB
Mölnlycke, SE
London SE5
S-411 39 GOTEBORG, SE
London SE22 9PQ, GB
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | free form fabrication welding machines for manufacturing three-dimensional objects layer-by-layer directly from computer-assisted drafting images, without using conventional tools for molds, using electrically conductive plastic or metal powders, and operating software therefor, sold as a unit; cyclone separators | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | [ electronic controllers for welding machines welding electrodes, electric welding machines, electric arc welders and computer software for use in connection with welding processes and equipment ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARCAM LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by ARCAM AB
- Other trademarks owned by Larson, Ralf
- Other trademarks owned by ARCAM AB
- Other trademarks owned by ARCAM LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ARCAM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2023 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| Sep 23, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2023 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2023 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Sep 23, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 18, 2023 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 13, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 13, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 22, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 1, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 29, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |