USPTO serial 75220818
SCIENTIFIC DREDGING INSTITUTE INC. KNOWLEDGE TO AID THE SCIENCE OF DREDGING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3011659Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 1, 2005
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SCIENTIFIC DREDGING INSTITUTE INC. KNOWLEDGE TO AID THE SCIENCE OF DREDGING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SCIENTIFIC DREDGING INSTITUTE, INC.
SAN JUAN, PR
Other trademarks owned by SCIENTIFIC DREDGING INSTITUTE, INC.
SCIENTIFIC DREDGING INSTITUTE, INC.
SAN JUAN, PR
Other trademarks owned by SCIENTIFIC DREDGING INSTITUTE, INC.
SCIENTIFIC DREDGING INSTITUTE, INC.
SAN JUAN, PR
Other trademarks owned by SCIENTIFIC DREDGING INSTITUTE, INC.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | franchising, namely, technical assistance in the establishment and/or operation of dredging companies | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 4, 1999 |
| 041 | educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences in the field of scientific dredging and handling of hazardous and non-hazardous materials, educational research on the theory and practice of dredging | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 2, 2000 |
| 042 | technical consulting and research in the field of the functions and problems that occur in the process of dredging | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 18, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SCIENTIFIC DREDGING INSTITUTE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SCIENTIFIC DREDGING INSTITUTE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SCIENTIFIC DREDGING INSTITUTE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SCIENTIFIC DREDGING INSTITUTE INC. KNOWLEDGE TO AID THE SCIENCE OF DREDGING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 17, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 9, 2005 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 28, 2000 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 29, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 1999 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 1, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 9, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 3, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |