USPTO serial 75220938
ENERGY SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENERGY SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H WILLIAM LARSON
H WILLIAM LARSON LARSON & LARSON, PA11199 69TH ST NLARGO, FL 33773UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PROVIDING ADVICE ON HOUSEHOLD AND COMMERCIAL COST SAVING METHODS | ACTIVE | Apr 30, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |