Drawing for COOKIE STIX

USPTO serial 75220964

COOKIE STIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COOKIE STIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LINDA J NOWLIN

LINDA J NOWLIN KEEBLER COMPANY677 LARCH AVEELMHURST, IL 60126UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030cookiesACTIVEJul 14, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 5, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 7, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 1, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 14, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 15, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 1997IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Nov 25, 1997AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 23, 1997IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 15, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance