USPTO serial 75221070
DAYSTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DAYSTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY GRONLUND
MARY GRONLUND BANNER & WITCOFF LTD1001 G ST NW 11TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4597UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | consumer technology products, namely, electronic video cameras for attachment to computers for purposes of video conferencing over the Worldwide Web or over telephone lines; video cameras for attachment to telephones and televisions for purposes of video telephone conferencing; an electronic device that attaches to the television to provide user access to the Worldwide Web; bar code scanners and pre-paid telephone cards magnetically encoded; magnetically encoded medical information cards; peripheral devices that allow for the transmission of information from paper to electronic form; computer hardware and peripherals, namely, wired and infrared keyboards, interface devices for accessing global computer networks; electronic on-line browsing software, word text editing, text management and E-mail, and user manuals sold with all said products | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | promoting the services of others who provide access to a server that connects customers to the Worldwide Web | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Daystar Services L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Daystar Services L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named DAYSTAR
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 26, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 17, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |