USPTO serial 75221486
HAPPILY EVER AFTER FAIRY TALES FOR EVERY CHILD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HAPPILY EVER AFTER FAIRY TALES FOR EVERY CHILD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT T SCHERER
ROBERT T SCHERER TIME WARNER INC1271 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10020UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | goods based on or relating to the applicant's television series of the same name, namely, dolls, puppets, board games, parlor games, card games and role playing games, playsets for dolls and imaginative play, toy building blocks, bath toys, toy boxes, children's activity tables containing manipulative toys, play mats containing infant toys, infant and crib toys, play equipment in the nature of jungle gyms, baby rattles, crib mobiles and toy mobiles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named HAPPILY EVER AFTER FAIRY TALES FOR EVERY CHILD
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 22, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 23, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |