USPTO serial 75221490
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT E LEE JR
ROBERT E LEE JR LEGAL DIVISION PAI J3508ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO2300 W PLANO PKWYPLANO, TX 75075| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | paper products, namely, greeting cards, business cards, stationary, envelopes, invitations, maps, ball-point pens, book marks, address labels, stickers, event guide books, color prints, calendars, paper flags, drawing pencils, illustrations, desk pads, printed paper signs, printed awards and writing tablets | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely, T-shirts, knit shirts, denim shirts, baseball caps, hats, jackets, sweat suits and golf shirts | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 30, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |