USPTO serial 75222074
PROFESSIONAL HAIR CUTTING FOR THE ENTIRE FAMILY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 9, 1999
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PROFESSIONAL HAIR CUTTING FOR THE ENTIRE FAMILY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM H MURRAY
WILLIAM H MURRAY DUANE MORRIS & HECKSCHER LLPONE LIBERTY PLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7396UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | hair cutting and hair styling services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 14, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2005 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 9, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 25, 1998 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 27, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 1998 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |