USPTO serial 75222223
QUADRAVISION ME!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUADRAVISION ME!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BOWNE INTERNET SOLUTIONS (CANADA) INC.
TORONTO, CA
Other trademarks owned by BOWNE INTERNET SOLUTIONS (CANADA) INC.
BOWNE INTERNET SOLUTIONS (CANADA) INC.
TORONTO, CA
Other trademarks owned by BOWNE INTERNET SOLUTIONS (CANADA) INC.
QUADRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED
Toronto, Ontario M4T 1L9, CA
Other trademarks owned by QUADRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOCELYN WEST BRITTIN
TYSONS CORNER MCGUIRE WOODS BATTLE & BOOTHE LLPJOCELYN W BRITTIN8280 GREENSBORO DR STE 900MCLEAN, VA 22102-3892Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software enabling clients to build profiles of their customers and to personalize and customize their marketing activities and general interactions with those customers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BOWNE INTERNET SOLUTIONS (CANADA) INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BOWNE INTERNET SOLUTIONS (CANADA) INC.
- Other trademarks owned by QUADRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named QUADRAVISION ME!
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 12, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 20, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |