USPTO serial 75222322
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Whitestown, Dublin 24, IE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HEIDI L HOLMAN
HEIDI L HOLMAN FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELMAN1111 THIRD AVE STE 3400SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic magnification devices consisting of electronic scanners, display monitors, and computer hardware and software for the control of same, for use by the visually impaired for the magnification and display of text and images, and user manuals sold therewith as a unit | ACTIVE | Jan 10, 1996 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2000 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |