USPTO serial 75222390
CHICO'S TECATE GRILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILSON, ANGELA BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHICO'S TECATE GRILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY D COHEN
CHICO'S INTERNATIONAL INC17801 MAIN ST STE AIRVINE, CA 92614-6706UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 27, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 23, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 30, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1997 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |